ArcherSource
// ratings

Trustworthy ratings are slower on purpose.

ArcherSource is preparing community ratings from caller-provided evidence, correction, and abuse-signal packets so public scores cannot outrun the review model that makes them worth trusting.

Attendance before opinion

Ratings can only move forward when the packet proves the reviewer had verified attendance or a comparable evidence trail.

Corrections stay visible

Every rating needs a correction path and review record, so mistakes become fixable instead of permanent public scores.

Abuse resistance first

Harassment, brigading, conflicts, minor privacy issues, and incentive concerns route to review before public use.

// review gates

Built for scores people can challenge

Open correction path
// Evidence

Primary evidence, stable subject IDs, and verified-attendee status are required before a score can support rankings.

// Correction

Open disputes, missing reviewer records, and unresolved correction evidence keep ratings out of public handoff.

// Privacy

Minor private data and personal attacks block publication instead of getting polished into public copy.

// No live votes

The first slice validates caller-provided packets only; it never writes votes, sends messages, or publishes scores.

// MEDIA.M12 blocks source fetches, database reads, model moderation, live votes, sends, publishes, secrets, spend, and production writes until review gates pass